TY - JOUR
T1 - Treosulfan-based conditioning is feasible and effective for cord blood recipients
T2 - A phase 2 multicenter study
AU - Milano, Filippo
AU - Gutman, Jonathan A.
AU - Deeg, H. Joachim
AU - Nemecek, Eneida R.
AU - Baumgart, Joachim
AU - Thur, Laurel
AU - Dahlberg, Ann
AU - Salit, Rachel B.
AU - Summers, Corinne
AU - Appelbaum, Frederick R.
AU - Delaney, Colleen
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a research grant from Medac GmbH (Wedel, Germany). F.M. and L.T. were supported by the George and Fay Young Foundation
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Although the use of treosulfan (TREO) in conventional donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been extensively evaluated, its use in cord blood transplantation (CBT) for hematologic malignancies has not been reported. Between March 2009 and October 2019, 130 CBT recipients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter phase 2 study. The conditioning regimen consisted of TREO, fludarabine, and a single fraction of 2 Gy total-body irradiation. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. The primary end point was incidence of graft failure (GF), and based on risk of GF, patients were classified as low risk (arm 1, n = 66) and high risk (arm 2, n = 64). The median age was 45 years (range, 0.6-65 years). Disease status included acute leukemias in first complete remission (CR; n = 56), in ≥2 CRs (n = 46), and myelodysplastic (n = 25) and myeloproliferative syndromes (n = 3). Thirty-five patients (27%) had received a prior HCT. One hundred twenty-three patients (95%) engrafted, with neutrophil recovery occurring at a median of 19 days for patients on arm 1 and 20 days for patients on arm 2. The 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), transplant-related mortality, and relapse for the combined groups were 66%, 57%, 18%, and 24%, respectively. Among patients who had a prior HCT, RFS at 3 years was 48%. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen between the 2 arms. Our results demonstrate that TREO-based conditioning for CBT recipients is safe and effective in promoting CB engraftment with favorable clinical outcomes.
AB - Although the use of treosulfan (TREO) in conventional donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been extensively evaluated, its use in cord blood transplantation (CBT) for hematologic malignancies has not been reported. Between March 2009 and October 2019, 130 CBT recipients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter phase 2 study. The conditioning regimen consisted of TREO, fludarabine, and a single fraction of 2 Gy total-body irradiation. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. The primary end point was incidence of graft failure (GF), and based on risk of GF, patients were classified as low risk (arm 1, n = 66) and high risk (arm 2, n = 64). The median age was 45 years (range, 0.6-65 years). Disease status included acute leukemias in first complete remission (CR; n = 56), in ≥2 CRs (n = 46), and myelodysplastic (n = 25) and myeloproliferative syndromes (n = 3). Thirty-five patients (27%) had received a prior HCT. One hundred twenty-three patients (95%) engrafted, with neutrophil recovery occurring at a median of 19 days for patients on arm 1 and 20 days for patients on arm 2. The 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), transplant-related mortality, and relapse for the combined groups were 66%, 57%, 18%, and 24%, respectively. Among patients who had a prior HCT, RFS at 3 years was 48%. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen between the 2 arms. Our results demonstrate that TREO-based conditioning for CBT recipients is safe and effective in promoting CB engraftment with favorable clinical outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090459057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090459057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/BLOODADVANCES.2020002222
DO - 10.1182/BLOODADVANCES.2020002222
M3 - Article
C2 - 32706891
AN - SCOPUS:85090459057
SN - 2473-9529
VL - 4
SP - 3302
EP - 3310
JO - Blood Advances
JF - Blood Advances
IS - 14
ER -