TY - JOUR
T1 - Washington's Medicaid Transformation Project
T2 - Engaging the health care and social service sectors to improve health care delivery and address the social determinants of health
AU - Kushner, Jonah
AU - Byers, Jordan
AU - Petchel, Shauna
AU - Cohen, Deborah J.
AU - Jensen, Karen
AU - Bittinger, Katie
AU - McConnell, K. John
N1 - Funding Information:
At the center of MTP are Washington State's Accountable Communities of Health (ACHs), independent organizations tasked with identifying population health needs and carrying out projects to improve care and health in their regions. Inspired by the collective impact movement, 9 ACHs serve as conveners that bring together partners and coordinate efforts to improve population health. 10 Starting in 2015, Washington State used funding from a federal State Innovation Model grant to support the formation of ACHs by local health improvement coalitions. Nine ACHs emerged to cover the entire state, with each ACH defined by a non-overlapping set of counties ( Figs. 1 and 2 .).
Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Washington State Health Care Authority and the Silver Family Foundation. The authors would like to thank Michael Arnis, Deputy Policy Director, Washington State Health Care Authority and Chase Napier, MTP Program Manager, Washington State Health Care Authority for their generosity with information about MTP and their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Across the US, states have initiated reforms to improve population health by coordinating efforts among health care stakeholders and addressing health-related social needs. Washington State's Medicaid Transformation Project (MTP), launched in 2017, seeks to achieve these goals by supporting the state's Accountable Communities of Health, independent organizations that convene and coordinate the health care and social service sectors in nine regions of the state. MTP places Medicaid funds in the hands of ACHs for the purpose of building health system capacity and carrying out health improvement projects. It includes new supports for aging, housing and employment, and substance use disorder treatment. Early lessons from MTP are emerging that can inform health system transformation efforts in other states. MTP demonstrates the advantages of creating new organizations to serve as regional conveners and coordinators. However, the introduction of new entities will require states to clearly articulate the varying roles of these entities and existing managed care organizations and state agencies. States will need to balance the tradeoffs of local control versus centralization. For example, it may be optimal to standardize electronic health information exchanges but allow organizations flexibility to adopt other interventions that match their local context. In addition, states should build treatment and comparison groups into their program designs in order to generate high-quality evidence about the impact of new health care delivery and payment models.
AB - Across the US, states have initiated reforms to improve population health by coordinating efforts among health care stakeholders and addressing health-related social needs. Washington State's Medicaid Transformation Project (MTP), launched in 2017, seeks to achieve these goals by supporting the state's Accountable Communities of Health, independent organizations that convene and coordinate the health care and social service sectors in nine regions of the state. MTP places Medicaid funds in the hands of ACHs for the purpose of building health system capacity and carrying out health improvement projects. It includes new supports for aging, housing and employment, and substance use disorder treatment. Early lessons from MTP are emerging that can inform health system transformation efforts in other states. MTP demonstrates the advantages of creating new organizations to serve as regional conveners and coordinators. However, the introduction of new entities will require states to clearly articulate the varying roles of these entities and existing managed care organizations and state agencies. States will need to balance the tradeoffs of local control versus centralization. For example, it may be optimal to standardize electronic health information exchanges but allow organizations flexibility to adopt other interventions that match their local context. In addition, states should build treatment and comparison groups into their program designs in order to generate high-quality evidence about the impact of new health care delivery and payment models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109455695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109455695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100560
DO - 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100560
M3 - Article
C2 - 34252708
AN - SCOPUS:85109455695
SN - 2213-0764
VL - 9
JO - Healthcare
JF - Healthcare
IS - 3
M1 - 100560
ER -