What the American Journal of Critical Care Junior Peer Reviewers Were Reading During the First Year of the Program: Caring for Patients With COVID-19

L. Douglas Smith, Jennifer Berube, Mintie Indar-Maraj, Patricia Rosier, Janeane Walker, Christian Justin Carreon, Regi Freeman, Katie Gabel, Angelica Hernandez, Meghan Kolmer, Tamala Proctor, Aluko A. Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Junior Peer Reviewer program of the American Journal of Critical Care provides mentorship in the peer review process to novice reviewers. The program includes discussion sessions in which participants review articles published in other journals to practice and improve their critical appraisal skills. The articles reviewed during the first year of the program focused on caring for patients with COVID-19. The global pandemic has placed a heavy burden on nursing practice. Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory failure is likely to improve their outcomes. Hospitals caring for patients needing prolonged ventilation should use evidence-based, standardized care practices to reduce mortality. The burden on uncompensated caregivers of COVID-19 survivors is also high, and such caregivers are likely to require assistance with their efforts. Reviewing these articles was helpful for building the peer review skills of program participants and identifying actionable research to improve the lives of critically ill patients. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2022;31:e26-e30).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e26-e30
JournalAmerican Journal of Critical Care
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What the American Journal of Critical Care Junior Peer Reviewers Were Reading During the First Year of the Program: Caring for Patients With COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this