When open-ended questions don't work: The role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions

Eric Roeland, Julia Cain, Chris Onderdonk, Kim Kerr, William Mitchell, Kathryn Thornberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

The balance between patient autonomy and medical paternalism must be reexamined. The tension between autonomy and paternalism is both an ethical and practical issue. Autonomy is the current gold standard approach to patient communication and has grown to the point that patient preference dictates care, even when their choices are not possible or are medically nonbeneficial. Furthermore, we have observed a trend among physicians to avoid making difficult medical decisions by hiding behind a shield of patient autonomy. Paternalism, characterized as the antithesis of autonomy, is widely dismissed as having any role in medicine. We disagree and believe that paternalism still has an important role in medical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-420
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When open-ended questions don't work: The role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this